Top 10 Alternatives to Hume AI for Text-to-Speech in 2025
.webp)
Hume AI has positioned itself as one of the best text-to-speech (TTS) models in the market. Its models depict emotional intelligence, which facilitates empathetic interactions with the listeners seamlessly.
However, this AI voice generator fails to hit the mark in certain areas.
For instance, it has limited integrations with other business tools, and the pricing model can be confusing. Additionally, this emotional AI platform only charges based on how expressive a particular output is, which can be difficult to ascertain beforehand.
As a result, enterprises must look at viable Hume AI competitors that can generate natural-sounding audio from text while offering enough robust integrations and clear pricing models.
In this article, let's look at the top ten Hume AI alternatives that can capture user emotions to generate human-like speech in 2025.
10 Best Hume AI Alternatives in 2025
1. Murf AI

Best for: Creators, educators, and enterprises with a global audience
Key Features:
- Over 200 voices in 20+ languages
- Voice cloning/custom voice creation
- Personalize pitch, speed, pronunciation, and emotional expression
- AI dubbing, translation, and localization of content
Strengths:
- Very natural, human-sounding voices
- Integrations with popular creative and enterprise tools
Limitations:
- Free plan is quite limited
- Some features are only available in the enterprise plan
Pricing: Has a free plan; paid tier starts at $19/month, billed annually
Murf AI is a leading TTS solution that caters to content creators, educators, businesses, and large enterprises. Users can pick from over 200 voices available in 20+ languages that excel at relaying human emotions.
Apart from the sheer quality of AI-generated speech, it also offers voice cloning capabilities. This helps established brands maintain content consistency while relaying human emotions through AI interactions.
This Hume AI alternative also stands out in customization. Teams can control the pitch, speed, and emotional expressions in their TTS workflows to enhance the efficacy of their work.
For further fine-tuning, professionals can set specific pronunciation for select words that match their speaking style. The granular control enables companies to engage via emotional responses to increase trustworthiness.
Finally, the top Hume AI replacement can be effortlessly adopted into well-established creative processes. Murf AI offers seamless integrations to popular enterprise platforms like PowerPoint, Slides, Canva, Notion, and Adobe Suite.
2. ElevenLabs
.webp)
Best for: Power users with high-volume requirements
Key Features:
- Dozens of voice-generation models & presets
- Voice cloning from short audio clips
- Offers over 70 languages
Strengths:
- Very natural, high-fidelity voice quality
- Responsive API and developer support
Limitations:
- Complex agentic integration process
- Usage-based pricing can be unpredictable
Pricing: Has a free plan; paid tier starts at $4.17/month, billed annually
ElevenLabs is another top Hume AI competitor known for helping brands generate emotionally-rich voiceovers in multiple languages. It can generate audio content from text in 70+ languages.
This AI-powered voice cloning and TTS tool can understand the context of the text and pick the right pace, tone, and emphasis, exhibiting emotional intelligence. Such capabilities can elevate human well-being in industries like healthcare and sectors like customer support.
Integrations work a bit differently with ElevenLabs compared to other SaaS tools. Instead of connecting the TTS functionality, users have to create a conversational agent that will drive AI interactions through the integration.
Another challenge with this AI solution is its pricing. ElevenLabs is a premium product, making it out of reach for growing businesses. Enterprises with high volume requirements may end up with large bills at the end of their processes. Also, unused credits don't roll over.
3. Play.ht
.webp)
Best for: Small to mid-sized creators or businesses
Key Features:
- 40+ languages with various accents and voices
- Custom voice creation and cloning
- Modify tone, pitch, pronunciation, etc.
Strengths:
- Intuitive interface that accelerates adoption
- Good for users working on one-off projects as well
Limitations:
- Voice cloning requires a fair amount of training audio
- Integrations are only available via API
Pricing: Has a free plan; pricing details aren’t publicly available
Play.ht is an AI voice generation solution that caters to businesses of all sizes. The platform allows users to generate audio via text-to-speech models in 40+ languages that are available in different accents and voices.
Developers can leverage a custom model API to access Play.ht's voice generators to create audio content for various applications.
However, there are certain limitations with this Hume AI alternative. The voice cloning ability requires a fair amount of training audio to work. And even then, the output reportedly sounds robotic compared to other tools like Murf AI.
Additionally, while the pricing is attractive for small businesses, power users like education professionals and podcasters may end up overpaying. And at last, Play.ht only offers customizable integrations via its API, slowing adoption for enterprises.
4. Speechify
.webp)
Best for: People who want to turn reading tasks into audio
Key Features:
- 200+ lifelike voices, including celebrity voices, in 60+ languages
- Ability to read many input types: PDFs, eBooks, emails, web articles, documents
- Cross-platform availability
- Strengths:
- Strong accessibility benefits for users with reading difficulties
- Helps productivity: enables users to “read” while doing other tasks
- Limitations:
- Higher-tier plans impose usage caps
- Lack of a custom pricing model for power users
- Pricing: Has a free plan; premium tier costs $11.58/month, billed annually
Speechify is a unique text-to-speech solution due to its positioning. It's promoted as a productivity tool that streamlines tasks like reading and learning. Text sources, like PDFs, eBooks, emails, and web articles, can be seamlessly converted into audio files.
Moreover, teams can choose from 200+ cloned voices, which include famous celebrities and personalities such as Snoop Dogg and MrBeast in their existing workflows. The output can positively impact the mental health of the listeners, boosting user satisfaction.
Furthermore, the embedded large language models (LLMs) in Speechify can summarize long walls of text before converting them into an audio file.
Of course, professionals can clone their own voice for different internal use cases, like employee training content creation. The platform also excels at producing natural sounds in non-English languages, although it's not perfect.
Speechify can be a limitation for enterprises with extensive needs, as it lacks a custom pricing model for power users. Its premium tier has usage caps, which restrict advanced features that are capable of producing emotional speech.
5. WellSaid Labs
.webp)
Best for: Enterprises, creators, or business teams
Key Features:
- 120+ voices and styles
- Collaboration capabilities to boost productivity
- Multiple export audio formats (MP3, WAV, OGG, etc.)
Strengths:
- Ethical usage of voice actor data
- Offers granular pronunciation control
Limitations:
- Fewer non-English languages and accents
- Can be costly for smaller creators or low-volume users
Pricing: Has a free plan; premium tier costs $50/month, billed annually
WellSaid Labs is a premium TTS platform catering to creators and enterprises that seek high-quality human voices. The tool ensures secure audio generation in standard formats (MP3/WAV) for various applications.
Developers can also access the models via API in their own systems to support business workflows. Teams can choose from 120+ voice options in this Hume AI replacement to personalize their output for different audiences.
The tool also comes with strong collaboration features, such as team workspaces, versioning, and project management. Such capabilities can keep users focused on their tasks as they won't be juggling multiple solutions.
However, there are some challenging aspects with WellSaid Labs. The language support is limited compared to other tools in this list, and it is suboptimal at generating non-English voices.
6. Synthesia
.webp)
Best for: Teams and brands who want to convert text into video
Key Features:
- 230+ AI avatars, including personal avatars
- 1000+ voices available across 140+ languages
- Branded video features for consistency
Strengths:
- Team collaboration features
- Powerful video localization features like AI dubbing
Limitations:
- Avatar lip-sync & facial/body language, at times, less natural
- No way to customize the emotional expression of avatars
Pricing: Has a free plan; premium tier costs $18/month, billed annually
Synthesia converts text into speech with video in minutes. Businesses can use it to elevate emotional expressions in their content piece, particularly for educational or knowledge-sharing applications.
Teams can choose from 230+ AI avatars that can replicate human emotions in 1000+ voices across 140+ languages. As it is a video generation tool, professionals can clone and create their own avatar that looks and sounds like them.
This competitor of Hume AI is known for its ease of use. Even non-technical stakeholders can generate videos from text in a few clicks and explore advanced features like translation, closed captions, and adding branded elements.
The key limitation of this solution is that for some avatars and uncommon languages/accents, the lip-sync and body language of the avatar may appear less human or natural. Such types of AI-generated content can be disengaging.
7. HeyGen
.webp)
Best for: Enterprises and creators that need to produce realistic videos from text
Key Features:
- High-quality AI avatars (pre-made and custom)
- Realistic lip-sync in over 175 languages and dialects
- One-click video localization (dubbing and captioning)
Strengths:
- Broad multilingual support
- Extremely intuitive interface
Limitations:
- Rendering/video generation can be slow
- Sometimes there are unexpected usage caps
Pricing: Has a free plan; premium tier costs $24/month, billed annually
HeyGen is another text-to-video generator like Synthesia that can be used for enterprise TTS applications. While it offers fewer avatars compared to the tool above, it covers 175+ languages.
Professionals can expect features like voice cloning, translation/dubbing tools, and speech customization based on pitch, emotion, etc. An intuitive interface speeds up its adoption in creative and business workflows.
This Hume AI replacement's biggest strength is the quality of generated videos. Its output is considered the best in the industry. The avatar's lip-sync with the audio and facial expressions are regarded as most realistic.
Two ways HeyGen can get better are rendering time and pricing. The tool can be painfully slow while generating high-quality videos. Usage caps for certain features that expire at the end of the month can be hard on the budget for users across segments.
8. Microsoft Azure Text-to-Speech
.webp)
Best for: Large businesses and enterprises already using or planning to use Microsoft’s cloud ecosystem
Key Features:
- Neural and HD voices with natural prosody
- Supports 140+ languages
- Real-time API capabilities
Strengths:
- Granular control over output
- Multiple audio formats and sampling rates
Limitations:
- Can be costly, especially for HD output
- Requires some technical expertise to learn
Pricing: Has a free tier; pricing depends on custom needs
Microsoft Azure Text-to-Speech is a powerful enterprise-grade solution that supports neural voices, custom voice creation, granular control over speech elements, and long-form audio generation for things like audiobooks and lectures.
Businesses can leverage it to create content in over 140 languages and dialects in different formats and qualities. Additionally, the platform is highly compatible with Azure SDKs, APIs, and cloud infrastructure, simplifying adoption for brands that operate in the Azure ecosystem.
This alternative to Hume AI is praised for generating natural-sounding neural voices that capture the full spectrum of emotional expressions. The AI voice generator also has real-time synthesis capabilities, helping brands respond to stakeholders with insights in an engaging way.
However, there are two key limitations. The tool can be expensive, especially for power users who need custom voices in HD format. Second, it has a steep learning curve, which slows adoption for business teams.
9. Amazon Polly
.webp)
Best for: Enterprises or developers who need TTS integrated into AWS infrastructure
Key Features:
- Dozens of lifelike voices (standard, neural, long-form, generative)
- Speech Synthesis Markup Language (SSML) & custom lexicons
- Support for real-time (streaming) synthesis
- Strengths:
- Generate audio from text in bulk
- Strong integrations with other AWS services
- Limitations:
- Request limits can throttle usage
- Requires technical skills to maximize value
- Pricing: Has a free tier; pricing depends on custom needs
Amazon Polly is another enterprise-grade TTS solution that runs on Amazon Web Services (AWS). It is used for various productivity-related functions, such as converting long-form text content like books and web articles into human-like audio tracks.
Professionals can access dozens of AI voices across multiple languages and customize the output based on their brand's needs. Everything from pronunciation, pace, inflection, and lexicons can be tailored to meet nuanced requirements.
As it is hosted on AWS, it has low latency, due to which the custom model API can support real-time AI interactions. This enables teams to build voice interfaces to elevate customer-facing processes like support, for example.
At the same time, this Hume AI replacement lags behind other tools like Murf AI in terms of voice quality and realness. On top of that, AWS enforces limits on the number of requests per second, concurrent tasks, etc., which can reduce throughput for enterprises.
10. Lovo.ai
.webp)
Best for: Individual creators or small to mid-sized teams
Key Features:
- 500+ AI voices in ~100+ languages
- Supports voice cloning
- In-built video editor, subtitle generator via Genny platform
Strengths:
- Affordable for low-usage requirements
- Integrated multimedia editing tools
Limitations:
- Voices can be more robotic compared to other TTS tools
- Reliability issues, as the tool is still developing
Pricing: Premium tier costs $24/month, billed annually
Lovo.ai makes its TTS tool accessible via a platform called Genny. The AI-powered audio generation solution can produce voices in 100+ languages and accents. Then, users can export the audio file in any popular format.
The simplified workflow makes it easy for fast-moving teams to produce quality content for different stakeholders. The integrated video editor, subtitle generator, and auto-captioning capabilities empower teams to polish their content further.
While this platform doesn't offer too many bells and whistles, it can be quite effective for individual creators and budding companies. This reduces adoption time for this Hume AI competitor.
However, Lovo.ai struggles to produce emotional expressions in non-primary voices and some foreign languages. Additionally, as the tool is still improving, there can be certain usability issues when generating speech from text.
How to Choose the Right Hume AI Replacement
There are four key parameters that will help businesses and enterprises to select the ideal TTS platform for their creative processes:
- Voice quality and realism: How close is the output of the AI voice generator to that of a human-created voice? It determines how engaging and impactful the audio file will be.
- Customization capabilities: Every instance of business communication is unique, which warrants a different style, tone, and emotion in an audio.
- Integration with enterprise tools: Robust in-built integrations make adoption easier while keeping the workflows lean.
- Scalability and ROI: Will the tool cost-effectively accommodate the growing needs around text-to-speech requirements? What does the innovation roadmap look like?
The above framework will greatly narrow down the options. Then, teams can test each of the tools that have passed the evaluation criteria to find a winner.
Murf AI: The Ideal Hume AI Alternative
Murf AI, one of the leading AI-powered TTS solutions, excels over Hume AI in many ways:
.webp)
- Supports over 200 voices in 20+ languages, each of which can be fine-tuned based on pitch, speed, accent, emphasis, and tone.
- Comes with a broader integration ecosystem that streamlines the adoption process.
- Favors users with all needs through its dynamic pricing plans, ensuring that even power users won’t have to overpay.
On top of everything, the team at Murf AI ships updates to the platform at regular intervals to continually elevate TTS workflows for enterprises.
Ready to produce human-like voices from text?
Sign up today and enjoy 10 minutes of free voice generation.

Frequently Asked Questions
Is Hume AI the best text-to-speech tool?
Hume AI excels in expressive voices and emotional nuance, making it stand out. However, its limited language support, higher costs, and learning curve mean there are better options available. More advanced, capable, and cost-effective solutions like Murf AI are considered a better alternative to Hume AI.
What is the best alternative to Hume AI for TTS applications?
Murf AI is widely considered the best alternative. It offers more voices, stronger multilingual support, and easier workflow integrations, making it suitable for creators, marketers, and enterprises that prioritize both customization and scalability.
How to choose the right AI text-to-speech platform?
Focus on voice realism, customization flexibility, integration options, and scalability. Assess how well the platform fits your business workflows and budget. The best TTS tool should balance lifelike voices with cost-effective growth and seamless enterprise compatibility.
Is Murf AI better than Hume AI for text-to-speech use cases?
Yes, in many business scenarios. Murf AI outshines Hume AI with broader language coverage, stronger customization, and easier integrations. While Hume AI has its perks, Murf AI offers better scalability, pricing, and versatility for everyday content creation and localization.